We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 11 January 19
SUPRAMAX: THE ASIAN ARENA HAD A MIXED START; LIMITED ACTION IN SOUTHEAST ASIA - THE BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
Dashed hopes summed up the first full week of the New Year. A slow start followed by a busy 24 hours of improving rates and a firming ...
Thursday, 10 January 19
BUNKER DELIVERY NOTE AMENDMENTS ENTER INTO FORCE AS SULPHUR 2020 REQUIREMENT LOOMS - IMO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Amendments to the bunker delivery note relating to the supply of marine fuel oil to ships which have fitted alternative m ...
Thursday, 10 January 19
WORLD TRADE IN THERMAL COAL IS ESTIMATED TO HAVE GROWN BY 1.0 PER CENT IN 2018 - DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, AUSTRALIA
World Trade
World trade in thermal coal is estimated to have grown by 1.0 per cent to 1.1 billion tonnes in 2018 but it is expected to decline ...
Thursday, 10 January 19
PAKISTAN'S COAL IMPORTS TO SURGE TO 30 MILLION TONS PER ANNUM BY 2020 - CEO, PIB
Pakistan’s coal imports are estimated to surge to 30 million tons/annum from existing 20 million tons/annum by the year 2020, given the plann ...
Wednesday, 09 January 19
PANAMAX: THE PACIFIC SAW RELATIVELY GOOD DEMAND PARTICULARLY FROM INDONESIA AND NOPAC - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
It was an active start to the New Year, with trading from West Australia maintaining momentum during the holiday period. Rates for Chi ...
|
|
|
Showing 1496 to 1500 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Coal Association
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
