We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 25 December 18
FUEL QUALITY AND SAFETY IN IMO CONVENTIONS: A GROWING CHALLENGE, EVEN PRIOR TO 1 JANUARY 2020 - IUMI
At the 100th session of the International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) Maritime Safety Committee (MSC) meeting discussions on fuel quality a ...
Monday, 24 December 18
DRY BULK MARKET: CAPESIZE MARKET ON BACKFOOT AS 2018'S END DRAWS NEAR - THE BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
Panic set in in the East as the holiday season approaches, with owners chasing rates lower. Rates on the key West Australia/China route ...
Friday, 21 December 18
4.2 MILLION DWT OF DRY BULK SHIPS SCRAPPED UNTIL 17 DEC, DOWN 71.6% Y/Y - BIMCO
2018 has been a slow year for dry bulk demolitions, with only 4.2 million DWT scrapped (as of 17 December), down 71.6% compared to last year. An al ...
Thursday, 20 December 18
INDONESIAN COAL PRICES DIVERGE FROM KEY BENCHMARK - FITCH RATINGS
The Newcastle 6,000kcal coal price benchmark that is widely used to determine most coal price estimates for Indonesian coal miners has increasingly ...
Wednesday, 19 December 18
CHINA'S IMPORT RESTRICTIONS ON COAL SPOILS THE PARTY FOR PANAMAXES - DREWRY
The Chinese government’s objective of suppressing coal and lignite imports in November and December 2018 is adversely impacting demand for Pa ...
|
|
|
Showing 1516 to 1520 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Australian Coal Association
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- White Energy Company Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
