We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 30 December 18
MAJOR LNG BUYERS' UNCONTRACTED DEMAND TO QUADRUPLE BY 2030 - WOOD MACKENZIE
Wood Mackenzie’s latest research reveals that uncontracted demand by the world’s seven largest LNG buyers could quadruple to 80 million ...
Saturday, 29 December 18
DELIVERY OF CARGO WITHOUT PRODUCTION OF THE ORIGINAL BILL OF LADING - TT CLUB
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
As the bill of lading is a document of title, a person presenting it to the carrier or its agent is ostensibly entitled t ...
Friday, 28 December 18
BIMCO 2020 SULPHUR CLAUSES: "A FAIR ALLOCATION OF RESPONSIBILITIES AND LIABILITIES'? - INCE & CO.
To assist owners and charterers to address the legal issues arising under any time charterparties, which will span the 1 January 2020 implementatio ...
Thursday, 27 December 18
DRY BULKERS SPOT FREIGHT MARKET W/E 21 DEC - ALLIED SHIPBROKING
Capesize
A negative week for the Capesize sector, as activity remained at low levels, especially in the Pacific, with rumors regarding agreed r ...
Thursday, 27 December 18
SHIPPING IS ENTERING A NEW ERA OF EVER CHALLENGING CONDITIONS - ALLIED
As we move closer to the end of the year and we look forward into New Year, we are still finding ourselves looking deep into a market outlook full ...
|
|
|
Showing 1511 to 1515 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- PTC India Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- White Energy Company Limited
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- The University of Queensland
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
