We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 09 January 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INERMODAL
Paraphrasing the words of a Chief economist in a latest report of the World Bank Group, the current state of the shipping market very much resemble ...
Tuesday, 08 January 19
GLOBAL TRADE GROWTH EXPECTED TO REMAIN AT HEALTHY IN 2019 - ALLIED
2019 is here and we find ourselves with new challenges for the shipping industry and the global economy as whole, with market prospects being neith ...
Monday, 07 January 19
THE NEWCASTLE BENCHMARK SPOT PRICE IS FORECAST TO DECLINE FROM AN ESTIMATED AVERAGE OF US$105 A TONNE IN 2018 TO US$74 A TONNE IN 2020 - DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRY, AUSTRALIA
• The Newcastle benchmark spot price is forecast to decline from an estimated average of US$105 a tonne in 2018 to US$74 a tonne in 2020, prim ...
Monday, 07 January 19
INDONESIAN GOVERNMENT DECLARED COAL BENCHMARK PRICE FALLS FOR FIFTH STRAIGHT MONTH IN JANUARY 2019; LOWEST SINCE JUNE 2018
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised down again the benchmark price of Indonesian th ...
Monday, 07 January 19
RUSSIA'S COAL PRODUCTION UP 5.9% TO 433.4 MLN TONNES IN 2018 - TASS
Coal production in Russia in 2018 increased by 5.9% year-on-year to 433.4 mln tonnes, according to the Central Dispatching Department of Fuel Energ ...
|
|
|
Showing 1501 to 1505 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- White Energy Company Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
|
| |
| |
|