We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 20 January 19
OIL MARKET REPORT: A MARATHON, NOT A SPRINT - IEA
Last month, we asked if there was a floor under prices following the signing of a new Vienna Agreement that aims to re-balance the oil market. Foll ...
Thursday, 17 January 19
EIA ESTIMATES THAT U.S. COAL EXPORTS WERE 116 MMST IN 2018, 20% HIGHER THAN THE AMOUNT EXPORTED IN 2017
Coal Supply
EIA estimates that coal production declined by 20 million short tons (MMst) (3%) in 2018, despite a 19 MMst increase in U.S. coal e ...
Thursday, 17 January 19
U.S COAL OUTPUT IS EXPECTED TO FALL BY 3 PER CENT IN 2019 - EIA
EIA forecasts that U.S. coal production will total 729 million short tons (MMst) in 2019, down by 25 MMst (3%) from 2018.
Acco ...
Wednesday, 16 January 19
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
As we go through the first days of the year and just a few weeks before the Chinese New Year, the ship repair sector is witnessing a big difference ...
Monday, 14 January 19
KOREA SOUTHERN POWER INVITES BIDS FOR 320,000 MT OF MIN 3,800 NCV COAL
COALspot.com: South Korea state-owned utility Korea Southern Power Co. Ltd (KOSPO) issued a tender for 320,000 MT of min 3,800 kcal/kg NCV coal for ...
|
|
|
Showing 1491 to 1495 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- White Energy Company Limited
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
