We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 22 March 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The crude tanker market continues to gather momentum as we head towards the end of 1Q2023, against a backdrop of strong U.S. exports paired with a ...
Wednesday, 22 March 23
WILL LOWER GAS PRICES SPARK SWITCHING IN EUROPE AND ASIA?
Record high prices devastated demand for gas and LNG across Asia and Europe last year. But with prices falling, companies are starting to re-evalua ...
Monday, 20 March 23
NTPC MULLS 5.4 MILLION TONNES COAL IMPORT IN FIRST HALF OF 2023-24: PTI
State-run power giant NTPC is planning to import around 5.4 million tonnes of coal to meet the supply shortage during the first half 2023-24 fiscal ...
Monday, 20 March 23
S. AFRICA’S EXXARO RESOURCES SAYS COAL PRICES COOLING OFF - REUTERS
South Africa’s Exxaro Resources on Thursday posted a 28% jump in 2022 profit after seeing average coal prices surge more than 150%, but warne ...
Saturday, 18 March 23
RUSSIAN LNG EXPORTS TO EUROPE REMAIN HIGH - VESSELS VALUE
Russian LNG exports to Europe remained at very high levels in February at 3.6 million CBM, following a 13 month high in January of 4.1 million CBM. ...
|
|
|
Showing 121 to 125 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Australian Coal Association
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Planning Commission, India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
