We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 18 March 23
HEDGE TO OFFSET LNG VOLATILITY, TRADERS TOLD - BALTIC EXCHANGE
A shift in imports from Asia to Europe led to significant volatility in liquefied natural gas shipping last year, prompting industry experts to urg ...
Friday, 17 March 23
INDONESIAN COAL PRICE REFERENCE UP AROUND 2.17% IN MARCH 2023
COALspot.com: Indonesian Coal Price Reference up around 2.17% in March 2023.
According to the new HBA regulation No. 41.K/MB.0 ...
Saturday, 11 March 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Uncertainty over the recovery of Chinese demand, demand destruction in Europe, as well as weather conditions will pivot the LNG market this summer. ...
Wednesday, 08 March 23
INDONESIAN COAL REFERENCE PRICE FORMULA HAS OFFICIALLY CHANGED
Indonesian Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources has officially changed the guideline for determining the benchmark price for the sale of coal c ...
Thursday, 02 March 23
INDIA'S SEABORNE CRUDE OIL IMPORTS IN 2022 INCREASED BY 11.5% YOY - BANCHERO COSTA
2022 has turned out to be a very positive year for crude oil trade, despite the surging oil prices and risks of economic recession, Banchero Costa ...
|
|
|
Showing 126 to 130 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Australian Coal Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
