We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 02 March 23
DRY BULK MARKET: THE WAY CHINA GOES, SO GOES THE MARKET - BIMCO
We expect demand growth within the 1.5-2.5% range in 2023, driven by China’s economic recovery. Improvements in consumer sentiment should hel ...
Thursday, 02 March 23
INDIA, CHINA DEMAND BOOST LOW-RANK THERMAL COAL PRICES IN ASIA - RUSSELL, REUTERS
Signs of stronger import demand from India have arrested the decline in price of the thermal coal grades most commonly sought by the world’s ...
Thursday, 02 March 23
INDIA CHEERS THE RETURN OF ‘KING COAL’ AS INDUSTRY SEES BUOYANT FUTURE - REUTERS
India’s coal industry celebrated the return of its major conference after a three-year pandemic hiatus by presenting a bullish view of demand ...
Wednesday, 01 March 23
GEO CONNECT ASIA RETURNS IN MARCH TO ACCELERATE THE REGION’S GEOSPATIAL AND LOCATION INTELLIGENCE CAPABILITIES
Press Release: The third edition of GCA will be held in conjunction with Digital Construction Asia and the inaugural Drones Asia – an event d ...
Wednesday, 01 March 23
THE DECLINE IN THE COAL PRICE SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR HAS BEEN SIGNIFICANT - INTERMODAL
Last week, the front-month API2 future rose by 3.5%, but since the beginning of the year the future has fallen by 39% to $136.65/t, while the Newca ...
|
|
|
Showing 131 to 135 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- The University of Queensland
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Australian Coal Association
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
|
| |
| |
|
