We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 25 March 23
COAL INDIA HAS STRONG CASE TO INCREASE PRICES, TALKS ON: CMD AGRAWAL - BUSINESS STANDARD
Coal India (CIL) Chairman and Managing Director Pramod Agrawal said on Monday there is a “strong case” for increasing coal prices, and ...
Saturday, 25 March 23
ASIAN CRUDE PALM OIL WATCH 1Q23 - FITCH RATINGS
Malaysian benchmark crude palm oil (CPO) spot prices have averaged around USD915 per tonne (t) so far in 1Q23, sharply lower than the average of ar ...
Saturday, 25 March 23
INDONESIA’S COAL EXPORT INCREASED BY 21.0% YOY TO 388.4 MLN T IN 2022 - BANCHERO COSTA
After a slow start in the first quarter, global coal trade has really picked up pace last year, and is now fully back to pre-Covid levels. In the f ...
Saturday, 25 March 23
GLOBAL LNG-ASIA SPOT PRICES SLIP AS WEAK NORTHERN DEMAND REMAINS - REUTERS
Asian spot prices of liquefied natural gas (LNG) declined this week, falling to a 21-month low, as weak demand in the northeast Asia region continu ...
Wednesday, 22 March 23
OIL PRICE FALL SPECULATIVE, TO HIT $140 BY YEAR-END -ANDURAND: REUTERS
The recent fall in oil prices due to banking jitters is speculative and oil will hit $140 a barrel by the end of the year, hedge fund manager Pierr ...
|
|
|
Showing 116 to 120 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
