We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 11 April 23
OIL RISES ON CHINA STIMULUS EXPECTATIONS, WEAKER DOLLAR - REUTERS
Oil prices rose on Tuesday on expectations of potential economic stimulus by China, healthy demand in the rest of Asia and a drop in U.S. crude sto ...
Sunday, 09 April 23
CHINA’S BUSINESS INCOME REBOUND POINTS TO IMPROVING ECONOMY: OFFICIAL - XINHUA
Chinese businesses have posted a strong rebound in sales revenue since the beginning of this year in the latest signal of an improving economy.
...
Sunday, 09 April 23
COAL INDIA TO BOOST SUPPLIES TO INDUSTRIES AS UTILITIES’ INVENTORIES RISE - REUTERS
Coal India Ltd will increase supplies to industries, the world’s largest coal miner said on Wednesday as fuel inventories at utilities run by ...
Thursday, 06 April 23
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
LNG Current Supply/Demand Dynamics
This year, LNG supply will likely exceed demand, so prices will need to decline to levels that will encourag ...
Sunday, 26 March 23
EUROPE’S RUSH TO LNG COULD TURN INTO 'WORLD’S MOST EXPENSIVE AND UNNECESSARY INSURANCE POLICY'- CNBC
Europe’s rapid buildout of liquefied natural gas infrastructure is on track to far exceed demand by the end of the decade, according to new r ...
|
|
|
Showing 111 to 115 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- MS Steel International - UAE
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
|
| |
| |
|
