We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 26 January 20
SUPRAMAX: THE ASIAN BASIN SAW A 56,000DWT SHIP FIXING DELIVERY SAMARINDA TRIP TO WEST COAST INDIA AT $4,750 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The market endured heavy losses throughout the past week, with the Capesize 5TC dropping from $8,352 to $4,772. In the lead up to Chin ...
Sunday, 26 January 20
SHIPPING NEEDS TO PREPARE FOR CORONAVIRUS RESTRICTIONS WARNS HILL DICKINSON
The shipping industry needs to be prepared for potential restrictions in order to prevent the further spread of the ‘Wuhan’ coronavirus ...
Friday, 24 January 20
LOW-SULPHUR FUEL OIL PRICES DROP USD 99 PER MT IN SINGAPORE - BIMCO
Singapore has seen one of the largest drops in the price of Very Low Sulphur Fuel Oil (VLSFO), which peaked on 7 January 2020 at USD 740 per metric ...
Friday, 24 January 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE REMAINED FLAT DURING THE PAST WEEK - XINHUA
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of coal prices in north China’s major ports, stood at 553 yuan (about 80.1 U.S. dollars) ...
Thursday, 23 January 20
PANAMAX: ANOTHER DISAPPOINTING WEEK IN BOTH THE ATLANTIC AND THE PACIFIC BASIN - FEARNLEYS
Cape Size
From bad to worse for the biggest ships as prices for low-sulphur fuel oil remain high whilst freight rates deteriorate further. Aver ...
|
|
|
Showing 1171 to 1175 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Australian Coal Association
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- PTC India Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
