We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 21 January 20
ASIA'S APPETITE FOR COAL GROWS, WITH CHINA THE KEY DECIDER - NIKKEI
Although renewable power generation is expected to rise significantly in Asia, India’s vast electricity needs will still underpin global dema ...
Tuesday, 21 January 20
THERMAL COAL PRICES SET FOR RECOVERY THIS YEAR AS OVERSUPPLY TIGHTENS - REUTERS
Thermal coal prices are expected to recover this year after losing around a third of their value last year as demand from some south-east Asian cou ...
Monday, 20 January 20
INDIA TO STOP SUBSTITUTABLE COAL IMPORT; CAN GO FOR AUCTION OF 100 FULLY EXPLORED NEW BLOCKS: JOSHI - PTI
The Cabinet recently approved promulgation of Mineral Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2020 to amend Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation ) Act ...
Monday, 20 January 20
CHINA DECEMBER COAL OUTPUT UP 2.4 PERCENT ON YEAR - STATS BUREAU: REUTERS
China produced 331.74 million tonnes of coal in December, up 2.4 percent on the year, the National Bureau of Statistics said on Friday.
...
Monday, 20 January 20
CHINA IMPORTED 124.4 MLN TONNES OF COAL FROM INDONESIA IN 2019, UP 15.1 PERCENT YOY - BANCHERO COSTA
China's coal imports raced ahead in 2019, surprising many who had expected that in the months of 2019 to come the government would clamp down s ...
|
|
|
Showing 1181 to 1185 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PTC India Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- White Energy Company Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
|
| |
| |
|
