We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 23 January 20
AFRICAN POWER PLATFORM PUBLISHES REPORTS ON POWER SECTOR FRAMEWORK FOR SELECTED AFRICAN COUNTRIES
Press Release: African Power Platform publishes Reports on Power Sector Framework for selected African Countries
With the repo ...
Thursday, 23 January 20
COAL-BASED ELECTRICITY GENERATION SURGES 95% IN 2019 - PROFIT PAKISTAN TODAY
Coal-based power generation jumped 94.5 percent to 2,030 Gigawatt hours (GWh) in the year to November 2019, taking its share in the country’s ...
Wednesday, 22 January 20
INDIA: COAL PRODUCTION FROM CAPTIVE MINES RAISES 24% OUTPUT IN APRIL TO DECEMBER - FINANCIAL EXPRESS
Coal production from captive mines in the first nine months of the ongoing financial year was up 24% year-on-year (y-o-y) at 40.93 million tonne (M ...
Wednesday, 22 January 20
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
It seems that we are finally seeing whitish smoke as far as the trade feud between the US and China is concerned, while following this much anticip ...
Tuesday, 21 January 20
IRON ORE - 5 THINGS TO WATCH IN 2020 - WOOD MACKENZIE
Wood Mackenzie identifies five trends that will impact the iron ore industry.
Slower demand growth (especially in China) and a decen ...
|
|
|
Showing 1176 to 1180 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- White Energy Company Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Australian Coal Association
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
