We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 30 January 20
PRIVATE SECTOR COMPANIES SEEK 'LEVEL PLAYING FIELD' FOR COAL BLOCK AUCTION - PTI
Private sector companies scouting opportunities for commercial coal mining in the country are seeking a “level playing field” to encour ...
Thursday, 30 January 20
CAPE: WITH CHINESE NEW YEAR TAKING PLACE, THE RATES ARE REACHING FURTHER DISAPPOINTING LEVELS - FEARNLEYS
Cape
With Chinese New Year taking place, the rates are reaching further disappointing levels. Present TC average is below USD 4,500, off 24% fr ...
Wednesday, 29 January 20
INDONESIA REMAINS AT THE TOP SPOT IN 2019 AS THE LARGEST SUPPLIER OF COAL TO INDIA WITH 91.3 MLN TONNES - BANCHERO COSTA
Despite repeated promises from India’s government to reduce the country’s coal imports and increase domestic self-reliance, volumes jus ...
Wednesday, 29 January 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Last week Libya’s oil production operations were disrupted as it was reported that local Libyan tribes interrupted output at the the El Feel ...
Tuesday, 28 January 20
INDONESIA - UNCERTAINTY OVER AVAILABILITY OF LSFO - THE STANDARD CLUB
The club has received reports that low sulphur fuel is not currently readily available in all Indonesian ports and that there are local shortages.
...
|
|
|
Showing 1166 to 1170 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Planning Commission, India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Australian Coal Association
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
|
| |
| |
|
