We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 01 February 20
THERMAL COAL MARKETS: 5 TRENDS TO WATCH OUT FOR IN 2020 - MINING REVIEW
The seaborne thermal coal market entered the year challenged by low priced LNG in the Atlantic and rapidly increasing supply in the Pacific.
&n ...
Saturday, 01 February 20
COAL IS NOT GOING ANYWHERE - MINING REVIEW
The coal sector is living under the constant threat of being blamed by environmentalists as being responsible for a world disaster called global wa ...
Saturday, 01 February 20
CIL PRODUCTION TO NOT EXCEED 640 MILLION TON IN FY20: OFFICIAL - PTI
Hit by disruptions due to a prolonged monsoon, mining major Coal India Ltd’s production in the current fiscal will not exceed 640 million ton ...
Saturday, 01 February 20
WHO PAYS FOR IMO 2020? - FREIGHT WAVES
The United Nations’ International Maritime Organization (IMO) implemented its low-sulfur fuel mandate on January 1, 2020. Full enforcement be ...
Friday, 31 January 20
EIA EXPECTS U.S. ELECTRICITY GENERATION FROM RENEWABLES TO SOON SURPASS NUCLEAR AND COAL
In the latest long-term projections, the U.S Energy Information Administration (EIA) projects electricity generation from renewable sources such as ...
|
|
|
Showing 1161 to 1165 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Planning Commission, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The University of Queensland
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
