We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 04 February 20
CAPE: THE AVERAGE EARNINGS PER DAY FELL BENEATH THE USD 4,000, A LEVEL CONSIDERABLY BELOW EVEN THE MOST CONSERVATIVE OPEX LEVELS - ALLIED
The recent slump in the dry bulk freight market may well have been expected to some degree, but despite this the shock was still overwhelming when ...
Monday, 03 February 20
KOWEPO INVITING BIDS FOR 2.46 MILLION TONS OF MIN.5700 AND MIN.5600 NCV COAL
COALspot.com: South Korea’s Korea Western Power Co., Ltd. (KOWEPO) has issued an international tender for total 2,460,000 tons of (Sub) Bitum ...
Sunday, 02 February 20
NOVEL CORONAVIRUS OUTBREAK IN CHINA - STANDARD CLUB
Members will be aware of the recent novel coronavirus outbreak in China, which has now been declared a global emergency by the World Health Organis ...
Sunday, 02 February 20
SUPRAMAX: A 52,000DWT SHIP WAS FIXED BASIS DELIVERY SOUTH KALIMANTAN TRIP TO INDIA, AT $6,000 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The week proved conspicuous for all the wrong reasons. This was the week when the Baltic Capesize Index (BCI) turned negative, closing ...
Saturday, 01 February 20
50 MILLION PEOPLE QUARANTINED IN CHINA TO CONTAIN SPREAD OF CORONAVIRUS - HOW DOES IT AFFECT SHIPPING? - BIMCO
The outbreak of the novel coronavirus, declared a global health emergency by the WHO, has caused massive uncertainty across the global markets with ...
|
|
|
Showing 1156 to 1160 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Australian Coal Association
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PTC India Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
|
| |
| |
|
