We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 06 February 20
CHINESE DEMAND KEY UNCERTAINTY FOR SEABORNE COAL MARKET IN 2020 - THE BRICS POST
Coal trader Noble Resources head of research Rodrigo Echeverri Cardozo had penciled in a 3 Mt drop in Chinese import demand for 2020, but it could ...
Wednesday, 05 February 20
CORONAVIRUS AND THE SHIPPING INDUSTRY - WATSON, FARLEY & WILLIAMS
The continued spread of Coronavirus and governmental measures to minimise the impact is likely to affect the shipping industry and supply chain.
...
Wednesday, 05 February 20
INDONESIA'S COAL PRICE REFERENCE UP 1.46% IN FEBRUARY
COALspot.com: The Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of the Republic of Indonesia has revised up the benchmark price of Indonesian thermal co ...
Wednesday, 05 February 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
The oil and gas industry benefitted from a strong and solid ground in the previous year. We witnessed a slow but steady increase in bunker’s ...
Wednesday, 05 February 20
RUSSIA EXPORTED 28.6 MLN TONNES OF LNG IN 2019 - REFINITIV
A lot of attention has been paid recently on the surge in LNG exports from the United States. However, another country which is seeing truly expone ...
|
|
|
Showing 1151 to 1155 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PTC India Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
