We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 09 February 20
SUPRAMAX: THE ASIAN ARENA STRUGGLED, A 50,000DWT SHIP FIXING A COAL RUN FROM EAST KALIMANTAN TO INDIA AT $2,000 - THE BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize market endured another dreadful week of calamitous rate level falls, as the usual season low Q1 period combined with rece ...
Friday, 07 February 20
CIL LOOKING TO TAP NON-POWER SECTORS FOR INCREMENTAL COAL, PTI REPORTED
The miner is looking to ramp up production to meet its targets for the current fiscal at a time when the economic slowdown is impacting demand for ...
Friday, 07 February 20
VIRUS - HIT CHINA MAY NEED MORE IMPORTS OF COAL. NOW COMES THE TRICKY PART - SHIPPING IT THERE: REUTERS
China’s domestic coal mines are struggling to ramp up production in the face of the ongoing coronavirus epidemic. That’s a situation th ...
Friday, 07 February 20
CORONAVIRUS IMPACTING THE GLOBAL SHIPPING INDUSTRY - BIMCO
The outbreak of the novel Coronavirus has dented market sentiment and spooked markets around the globe. When China sneezes, we all catch the flu. T ...
Thursday, 06 February 20
CAPE: WEAK SUPPLY/DEMAND RATIO THE STREETS REMAIN BLOODY FOR THE BIG SHIPS - FEARNLEYS
Cape: With still a weak supply/demand ratio the streets remain bloody for the big ships, and actual spot earnings are close to zero on main short-h ...
|
|
|
Showing 1146 to 1150 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- The University of Queensland
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Australian Coal Association
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- White Energy Company Limited
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
