We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 03 March 20
IMPORTANCE OF MASTER'S CARGO CHECKS - BALTIC EXCHANGE
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Adecision in recent High Court case has made it clear that there is no implied indemnity from a charterer to their counte ...
Tuesday, 03 March 20
COAL'S SHARE OF CHINA ENERGY MIX FALLS IN 2019 BUT CONSUMPTION STILL RISING - REUTERS
Coal accounted for 57.7% of China’s primary energy consumption in 2019, the National Bureau of Statistics said on Friday, down 1.5 percentage ...
Monday, 02 March 20
SHIPOWNERS AND OPERATORS COULD FACE DETENTION OF SHIPS FROM 1ST MARCH UNDER IMO RULE - ICS
Port state control authorities will begin to enforce the IMO’s Sulphur 2020 from 1st March, making it an offense for ships to carry fuel that ...
Saturday, 29 February 20
SUPRAMAX SENTIMENT WAS UP IN A FEW KEY AREAS OVER THE LAST WEEK - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize market woes related to Coronavirus have now spread through the wider global markets like wildfire. The wider supply and d ...
Thursday, 27 February 20
FOREIGN COMPANIES LIKELY TO SKIP COMMERCIAL COAL BLOCK AUCTIONS - ECONOMIC TIMES
The Centre is in the process of inviting global players for commercial mining, following 100% foreign direct investment in the sector. However, giv ...
|
|
|
Showing 1101 to 1105 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- PTC India Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Australian Coal Association
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bhatia International Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
