We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 24 February 20
CHINA SAYS MAJOR COAL FIRMS RESTORE 95% OF PRODUCTION CAPACITY - REUTERS
China’s coal companies controlled by the central government have resumed operations and are back at more than 95% of their capacity, an offic ...
Sunday, 23 February 20
SHIPPING INDUSTRY FACES $370 MILLION HIT FROM NEW PANAMA CANAL CHARGE - REUTERS
A new “freshwater” charge that came in this month to help the Panama Canal cope with climate change will cost the shipping industry up ...
Sunday, 23 February 20
A 57,000DWT SHIP FIXING DELIVERY SOUTH KALIMANTAN TRIP, REDELIVERY CJK, AT $7,600 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize market found little to cheer about this week as it again endured remarkable lows. The Atlantic continued to improve, with ...
Saturday, 22 February 20
THE SURPRISING MOVE IN MARINE FUEL SPREADS - ING
Middle distillates tank
One of the biggest surprises since the implementation of new International Maritime Organization (IMO) sulphur regulati ...
Friday, 21 February 20
CAPE: AVERAGE NOMINAL DAILY EARNINGS STILL ADMITTEDLY UNCHANGED W-O-W AT BELOW US$3000 - FEARNLEYS
CAPE
The worst may just about be over for the big ships. Average nominal daily earnings still admittedly unchanged w-o-w at below US$3k, but sent ...
|
|
|
Showing 1111 to 1115 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- The University of Queensland
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
|
| |
| |
|
