We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 05 March 20
SEABORNE COAL'S STRUGGLES IN ASIA ARE MORE THAN JUST CHINA CORONAVIRUS - REUTERS
Asia’s seaborne coal markets stumbled in February and it appears the coronavirus outbreak in China may dodge most of the blame, with the weak ...
Thursday, 05 March 20
INDONESIA'S BUKIT ASAM 2019 OUTPUT RISES 10.2% Y/Y - REUTERS
PT Bukit Asam, Indonesia’s state-owned coal miner, said on Wednesday its output in 2019 rose 10.2% to 29.1 million tonnes.
Coa ...
Thursday, 05 March 20
SEEING REMOTELY - IN SAFETY: BUREAU VERITAS PERFORMS FIRST SURVEY BY DRONE - BUREAU VERITAS
Bureau Veritas Marine & Offshore (BV), a world leader in testing, inspection and certification (TIC) services has completed its first survey by ...
Wednesday, 04 March 20
AN EPIDEMIC OF UNCERTAINTY - THE CORONAVIRUS AND FORCE MAJEURE - WFW
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do the effects of the coronavirus give rise to legitimate force majeure claims in connection with shipbuilding contracts ...
Wednesday, 04 March 20
CHINA IMPORTED 76.8 MLN TONNES OF CRUDE OIL FOR JANUARY & FEBRUARY 2020; UP 3.4% YOY - REFINITIV | BC
The COVID-19 crisis has been gripping China already for almost two months now. It’s having a huge negative impact on the economy, and this is ...
|
|
|
Showing 1091 to 1095 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
|
| |
| |
|
