We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 04 March 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
As it was expected, the whole world has been focusing on the spread of the Coronavirus, with the fast outbreak being primarily a massive humanitari ...
Wednesday, 04 March 20
CORONAVIRUS: A WILDCARD FOR BULKS DEMAND - WOOD MACKENZIE
The coronavirus is casting a shadow across commodity markets. It has undermined China’s economic sentiment, putting the country’s growt ...
Wednesday, 04 March 20
THERMAL COAL TO 'PHASE OUT', STRONG DEMAND FOR COKING COAL: PLATO - SYDNEY MORNING HERALD
Plato Investments managing director Don Hamson says Australian iron ore producers are set to benefit in the fallout from coronavirus as China will ...
Wednesday, 04 March 20
CHINA PROVINCE TO CLOSE 10 MLN TONNES OF COAL CAPACITY IN 2020 - XINHUA
Southwest China’s Guizhou Province plans to phase out 10 million tonnes of outdated coal production capacity by closing 80 coal mines in 2020 ...
Wednesday, 04 March 20
UKRAINE PRODUCED OVER 2.55 MLN TONNES OF COAL IN FEBRUARY - UKRINFORM
In February 2020, Ukraine produced over 2.55 million tonnes of coal, which is 0.2% less than planned.
The Coal Miners Union of Ukrai ...
|
|
|
Showing 1096 to 1100 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- White Energy Company Limited
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
