We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 26 February 20
SHIPPING MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Coming from one of its busiest periods historically, with a list of scrubber and BWMS retrofits on a waiting list, the ship repair sector is witnes ...
Wednesday, 26 February 20
AS ALL OF THE GLOBAL COAL GIANTS EXIT SOUTH AFRICA, ESKOM TO DEPEND ON TWO MINERS FOR 70% OF ITS SUPPLY - BUSINESS INSIDER
While some of its politicians continue to imagine that coal has a future in South Africa, two key developments from the real world show that securi ...
Tuesday, 25 February 20
DELTA DUNIA MAKMUR REGISTERED A NET PROFIT OF US$20 MILLION FOR FY 2019
PT Delta Dunia Makmur, one of the largest coal mining company in Indonesia, has recorded an US$882 million revenue for FY 2019, 1% lower compared t ...
Tuesday, 25 February 20
SHIPPING UPDATE - ALLIED
The positive feeling and optimism for a fresh rally during the first few months of 2020 that prevailed in the tanker markets during the final quart ...
Monday, 24 February 20
COULD SOME VLSFO FUELS BE BANNED? - GIBSON
The run up to the implementation of the new IMO rules on marine fuels from1st January 2020 had owners and charterers analysing the vari ...
|
|
|
Showing 1106 to 1110 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Parliament of New Zealand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Planning Commission, India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
|
| |
| |
|
