We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 02 June 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 0.86 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 123.95 points Monday, down 0.86 percent week on week.
The index, released by Chi ...
Monday, 01 June 20
SUPRAMAX: IN SOUTH EAST ASIA RATES TRADED SIDEWAYS - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
A sober end to the week, with the market seemingly ready for the weekend. After a steady week of rate declines a small flurry of Atlan ...
Friday, 29 May 20
COVID-19: COAL SUPPLY BY CIL TO POWER SECTOR DIPS 22% TO 32 MT IN APRIL DUE TO DEMAND SLUMP - PTI
Over 95% of CIL’s production comes from its 171 open cast mines.
The supply of coal to the power sector by state-owned Coal In ...
Friday, 29 May 20
AUSTRALIA'S NEW HOPE WARNS OF HIT FROM COAL PRICE SLUMP - REUTERS
Australia’s New Hope Corp Ltd said on Thursday that a sudden drop in thermal coal prices and lower output from its Queensland operations woul ...
Friday, 29 May 20
GOVT MAY LAUNCH COAL BLOCKS AUCTION PROCESS UNDER COMMERCIAL MINING ON JUN 11 - PTI
The Centre is likely to launch the process of coal blocks auction under commercial mining on June 11 and around 50 mines are expected to go under t ...
|
|
|
Showing 941 to 945 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Economic Council, Georgia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Australian Coal Association
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PTC India Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
|
| |
| |
|