We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 27 May 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX UP 0.94 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 125.03 points Monday, up 0.94 percent week on week.
The index, released by China ...
Monday, 25 May 20
NON-OPEC OIL SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT - OPEC
Non-OPEC oil supply continued to increase by 2.0 mb/d in 2019, driven by US shale production, which rose by 1.7 mb/d, amounting to 84% of total non ...
Sunday, 24 May 20
A 63,000 FIXED DELIVERY VIETNAM TRIP VIA INDONESIA REDELIVERY KOSICHANG AT $8,500 - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
After a week of bounce momentum the market appears to have stalled out once again. The Capesize 5TC has more than doubled since last F ...
Saturday, 23 May 20
COLOMBIA COAL OUTPUT DOWN 7.2% IN Q1 ON LOW PRICES, CORONAVIRUS LOCKDOWN - REUTERS
Coal production in Colombia, the world’s fifth-largest coal exporter, fell 7.2% in the first quarter because of low prices and coronavirus qu ...
Saturday, 23 May 20
EWP INVITES BIDS FOR 840,000 METRIC TONS OF MIN 5700 NAR COAL
COALspot.com: South Korea’s Korea East-West Power Co. Ltd (EWP) has Issued an International Tender for total Max 840,000 Metric Tons of min 5 ...
|
|
|
Showing 951 to 955 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
