We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 29 May 20
KOMIPO ON BEHALF FIVE KOREAN GENCOS INVITED COAL BIDS FOR 5,700 & 4999 NCV COAL FOR AUGUST 2020 LOADING
COALspot.com: South Korea’s Korea Midland Power Co.,Ltd (KOMIPO) on behalf five (5) Korean Gencos has Issued an International Tender for tota ...
Friday, 29 May 20
DRY BULK SHIPPING: NO QUICK RECOVERY FOR THE DRY BULK MARKET AS COVID-19 DIGS DEEPER
The outlook is poor for dry bulk, as the negative demand shock and overcapacity come together to send rates to multi-year lows, even a return to wo ...
Thursday, 28 May 20
COVID-19: A FORCE MAJEURE EVENT? - KYPRIANOU
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
While seeing the unexpected COVID-19 outbreak expanding worldwide and the first cases being identified in Cyprus, the com ...
Thursday, 28 May 20
OIL DEMAND RECOVERED BY 20% IN MAY AGAINST APRIL: RUSSIAN ENERGY MINISTER - TASS
Oil demand remains at a low level but the demand in May increased by 20% against April, Russian Energy Minister Alexander Novak said, cited by the ...
Thursday, 28 May 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Earlier in May, China’s top leaders convened for the annual National People's Congress, following over two months of delays due to the co ...
|
|
|
Showing 946 to 950 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
