We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 04 June 20
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE EDGES UP - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price rose slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge of ...
Thursday, 04 June 20
DON'T FORGET THE REAL PURPOSE OF RISK ASSESSMENTS - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
When doing a risk assessment, we often overcomplicate it and forget its real purpose.
Rather than ensuring that crew ...
Wednesday, 03 June 20
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
Once again shipping is about to venture into uncharted waters and before the challenges of the past decade are forgotten, shipowners will have to o ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
KOSPO LOOKING FOR 80000 MT OF 4200 NCV COAL FOR JULY
COALspot.com: Korea Southern Power Co., Ltd. (KOSPO) has issued an International tender for 80,000 Metric Tons (MT) 4200 NCV coal for 12 - 21, July ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
INDONESIAN COAL MINER BUMI RESOURCES Q1 OUTPUT UP 5% - REUTERS
Indonesia’s largest coal miner Bumi Resources posted a 5% increase in first-quarter output at 20.8 million tonnes, the company said in a stat ...
|
|
|
Showing 931 to 935 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- The University of Queensland
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- PTC India Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- White Energy Company Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
