We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 02 June 20
CHINA TAIYUAN COAL TRANSACTION PRICE INDEX DOWN 0.86 PCT - XINHUA
China Taiyuan coal transaction price index stood at 123.95 points Monday, down 0.86 percent week on week.
The index, released by Chi ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
THE HISTORIC DECLINE OF US COAL - WOOD MACKENZIE
The first commercial power plant in the US was Thomas Edison’s coal-fired Pearl Street station in lower Manhattan, which started operating in ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
COAL INDIA'S MAY SALES DRIVEN SHARPLY LOWER BY SLUMP IN POWER DEMAND - REUTER
Coal India’s sales fell 23.3% in May as utilities refrained from purchases amid record stockpiles and tepid demand because of a nationwide lo ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
TUAH TURANGGA AGUNG RECORDED 4.54 MILLION TONS OF COAL SALES IN THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF 2020
PT United Tractors Tbk through its subsidiary, PT Tuah Turangga Agung recorded 4.54 million tons of coal sales in the first four months of 2020, up ...
Tuesday, 02 June 20
SOURING SINO-AUSTRALIA TRADE RELATIONS - BALTIC EXCHANGE
Cooling relations between the commodity powerhouses of China and Australia may point to trade troubles ahead when the world emerges from the Covid- ...
|
|
|
Showing 936 to 940 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- The University of Queensland
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
|
| |
| |
|
