We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Sunday, 10 September 23
CHINA AUGUST COAL IMPORTS OF 44.3 MLN T HIT RECORD - REUTERS
China, the world’s top coal consumer, imported 44.3 million metric tons of the fuel last month, customs data showed, the highest amount in an ...
Tuesday, 22 August 23
CHINA'S COAL PRODUCTION LOGS STEADY GROWTH IN JANUARY-JULY: XINHUA
China’s output of raw coal went up 3.6 percent year on year in the first seven months of this year, official data showed.
The ...
Sunday, 13 August 23
THE COMMODITIES FEED: LNG SUPPLY RISKS LINGER - ING
Energy – OPEC sees deficit over remainder of 2023
Oil prices came under some pressure yesterday with ICE Brent settling a litt ...
Wednesday, 09 August 23
COAL TRADE TO RETURN TO 2019 LEVELS - BALTIC EXCHANGE
The International Energy Agency’s mid-year Coal Market Update for 2023 brings both positive and concerning news for the global coal industry. ...
Sunday, 23 July 23
ANALYSIS-INDIA'S COAL MINING BET STUMBLES AS WARY BANKS WEIGH RISING RISKS - REUTERS
India’s drive to ramp up coal output to meet growing energy demand is faltering due to banks’ reluctance to finance newly auctioned min ...
|
|
|
Showing 86 to 90 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Australian Coal Association
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- White Energy Company Limited
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
|
| |
| |
|
