We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 14 November 23
CHINA'S BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE TURNS AWAY FROM COAL - WOOD MACKENZIE
Ambitious, contentious and big spending, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is 10 years old. In that time, China has splashed more than U ...
Friday, 10 November 23
THE COMMODITIES FEED: OIL UNDER PRESSURE - ING
Energy – Brent plummets
The oil market came under significant pressure yesterday. ICE Brent settled 4.19% lower on the day and ...
Friday, 10 November 23
COAL USE AT U.S. POWER PLANTS CONTINUES DOWNWARD SPIRAL; FULL IMPACT ON MINES TO BE FELT IN 2024 - IEEFA
This year, the use of coal by the U.S.’s power producers has been so anemic that the fuel has not achieved a 20% market share in any month so ...
Friday, 10 November 23
INDIA: NATIONAL COAL INDEX RISES 3.83 POINTS IN SEPTEMBER AMID HIGHER DEMAND - LIVEMINT
The National Coal Index (NCI) rose 3.83 points to 143.91 in September amid growing demand for coal.
The union coal ministry on Tuesd ...
Thursday, 09 November 23
WE'RE PRODUCING TOO MUCH COAL, OIL AND GAS, REPORT SAYS - WSJ
World leaders pledged in 2015 to reduce emissions in a combined effort to limit climate change.
Now they are stepping up production ...
|
|
|
Showing 76 to 80 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Planning Commission, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- White Energy Company Limited
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- The University of Queensland
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
|
| |
| |
|
