We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 17 July 23
APPROVED AMMONIA-FUELED CONTAINERSHIP - BENEFITS AND RISKS: REED SMITH
Following the news in Offshore Energy that Korea Maritime Consultants has secured approval in principle from the American Bureau of Shipping for it ...
Friday, 14 July 23
CLEAN COAL USE KEY TO DEEP CUTS IN EMISSIONS, STABLE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY - CHINA DAILY
China must push for the clean use of coal and step up integration of the dirty fuel with carbon capture, utilization and storage to achieve sustain ...
Thursday, 13 July 23
VIETNAM'S COAL EMISSIONS PRIMED FOR SURGE AFTER IMPORTS JUMP - REUTERS
Vietnam’s thermal power emissions are primed for a steep climb this summer after the country’s imports of thermal coal soared to their ...
Monday, 26 June 23
COAL PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION UP IN 2022 - EUROSTAT
In 2022, EU coal production and consumption continued to increase, reaching 349 million tonnes (+5% compared with the previous year) and 454 millio ...
Wednesday, 21 June 23
QATAR STRIKES SECOND BIG LNG SUPPLY DEAL WITH CHINA - REUTERS
Qatar on Tuesday secured its second large gas supply deal with a Chinese state-controlled company in less than a year, putting Asia clearly ahead i ...
|
|
|
Showing 91 to 95 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- PTC India Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- The University of Queensland
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Australian Coal Association
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
|
| |
| |
|
