We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Thursday, 09 November 23
GREEK AND CHINESE COMPANIES OWN 34% OF THE GLOBAL FLEET’S CARGO CAPACITY - BIMCO
“The global fleet of cargo carrying ships consists of around 61,000 ships with a deadweight capacity of about 2,200 million tonnes. The ships ...
Monday, 23 October 23
CHINA SEPT COAL OUTPUT HITS SIX-MONTH HIGH ON RISING POWER DEMAND - REUTERS
China’s September coal output rose 0.4% from August to the highest level since March, official data showed on Wednesday, on rising power dema ...
Monday, 23 October 23
INDIA COAL INVENTORIES DROP AT FASTEST PACE IN TWO YEARS, BOOSTING IMPORTS - REUTERS
Coal inventories at Indian power plants in the first half of October fell at their fastest rate in two years, an analysis of government data showed ...
Tuesday, 19 September 23
LNG SHIPPING STOCKS: THE ASIAN GROWTH UP-INDICES
Last week, the UP World LNG Shipping Index (UPI) gained 3.81 points or 2.51%, closing at 155.85 points. This index tracks the performance of LNG sh ...
Sunday, 10 September 23
GOLDMAN SACHS PREDICTS OIL PRICE TO HIT $100 ON OPEC CUTS - YAHOO FINANCE
Oil supply cuts by Saudi Arabia and Russia could lead to Brent crude jumping as high as $107 a barrel in 2024, Goldman Sachs Commodities Research h ...
|
|
|
Showing 81 to 85 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- The University of Queensland
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- White Energy Company Limited
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Australian Coal Association
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
