We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 21 June 23
CHINA'S MAY COAL IMPORTS FROM AUSTRALIA RECOVER TO PRE-BAN LEVELS - REUTERS
Australian coal sales to China increased in May, as trade resumed between them even as overall coal demand weakened against an uncertain macroecono ...
Monday, 19 June 23
DROUGHT-DEPLETED HYDROPOWER DRIVES CHINA TO TURN TO COAL - REUTERS
China has leant hard on coal-fired power plants as well as wind and solar generators to make up for a shortfall in hydroelectric generation as a re ...
Monday, 19 June 23
CHINA COAL OUTPUT UP 4.2 PCT IN MAY - XINHUA
China’s raw coal output posted steady growth in May, official data showed.
The country produced 390 million tonnes of raw coal ...
Wednesday, 24 May 23
AMMONIA-FUELLED BULK CARRIERS WITHIN FIVE YEARS - BALTIC EXCHANGE
Within five years, ships powered by clean ammonia could be a feature on the iron ore trade routes between West Australia and East Asia.
A study ...
Tuesday, 23 May 23
CHINA'S APRIL COAL OUTPUT LEAPS 11% ON YEAR, BUT DEMAND DOWNTURN LOOMS - REUTERS
China’s daily coal output in April jumped 11% from the same month a year earlier, boosted by Beijing’s order to increase supply to ensu ...
|
|
|
Showing 96 to 100 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- PTC India Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Australian Coal Association
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Planning Commission, India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
|
| |
| |
|
