We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 22 November 23
INDIA: GOVERNMENT PLANS 1.4 BILLION TONNE COAL OUTPUT BY 2027 - LIVEMINT
The Union coal ministry on Monday announced plans to increase India’s coal production to 1.404 billion tonne by 2027, with an eye to further ...
Wednesday, 22 November 23
OBLIGATION. INDONESIA AIMS TO START COLLECTING LEVIES FROM COAL MINERS IN JANUARY - REUTERS
Indonesia plans to start collecting levies from coal miners in January to be used to compensate miners who sell coal to the state utility at lower ...
Tuesday, 21 November 23
INDIAN COAL POWER PLANTS’ CAPACITY UTILISATION WILL IMPROVE TO 65% THIS FISCAL: - CRISIL
Coal-based thermal power units’ plant load factor (PLF) or capacity utilisation will improve to 65 percent in the current fiscal year despite ...
Tuesday, 14 November 23
CAPITAL PRODUCT PARTNERS L.P. ANNOUNCES TRANSFORMATIVE TRANSACTION INCLUDING THE ACQUISITION OF 11 NEWBUILD LNG CARRIERS FOR $3.1 BILLION
Capital Product Partners L.P. announced that it has entered into an umbrella agreement (the “Umbrella Agreement”) with Capital Maritime ...
Tuesday, 14 November 23
COAL INDIA BEATS Q2 PROFIT VIEW ON HIGH POWER DEMAND AMID WEAK MONSOON - REUTERS
Coal India on Friday reported better-than-expected second-quarter profit, helped by high power demand and boosted production amid a weak monsoon.
...
|
|
|
Showing 71 to 75 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Planning Commission, India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- The University of Queensland
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Australian Coal Association
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
|
| |
| |
|
