We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 01 December 23
COAL MINERS GROUP EXPECTS INDONESIA’S 2023 COAL OUTPUT TO SURPASS TARGET - REUTERS
The Indonesian Coal Mining Association (ICMA) expects the country’s 2023 coal output to surpass the official target of 695 million metric ton ...
Friday, 24 November 23
COAL IMPORTS TO INDIA IN OCTOBER 2023 REACHED HIGHEST LEVELS IN NEARLY A YEAR AND A HALF - VESSELSVALUE, VESON NAUTICAL
In October, coal imports to India reached 13.8 mt in October 2023, according to Oceanbolt, a Veson Nautical solution, the highest level since May 2 ...
Friday, 24 November 23
COAL SHIPMENTS TO ADVANCED ECONOMIES DOWN 17% SO FAR IN 2023 - BIMCO
In the first ten months of 2023, coal shipments to advanced economies fell by 17% y/y, as demand for electricity declined and the share of electric ...
Friday, 24 November 23
INTELLIGENT COAL MINES CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVING SAFETY STANDARDS - CHINA DAILY
Mechanization, automation and intelligent upgrades have contributed to improved safety in coal mines, though the level of development of intelligen ...
Friday, 24 November 23
WHY AUSTRALIA'S COAL MINES ARE GETTING BIGGER - IEEFA
Australia’s largest coal mines are getting larger. Mines in New South Wales (NSW) are ramping up production following the state’s recov ...
|
|
|
Showing 66 to 70 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- The University of Queensland
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- PTC India Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
|
| |
| |
|
