We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 05 January 24
BANGLADESH’S 2023 COAL-FIRED POWER OUTPUT TRIPLED, EASING SHORTAGES - REUTERS
Bangladesh nearly tripled its coal-fired power output in 2023, a Reuters analysis of government data showed, helping it tide over the worst power s ...
Tuesday, 02 January 24
COAL TRADE CONTINUES TO HEAD EAST - BALTIC EXCHANGE
The global coal trade, once concentrated in the Pacific and Atlantic basins, is undergoing a significant transformation, as highlighted in the Inte ...
Tuesday, 02 January 24
COAL CARGOES: AVOIDING EXPLOSION AND SELF-HEATING - GARD
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Despite its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, global coal consumption climbed to an all-time high in 2022 and is ...
Tuesday, 02 January 24
SINOPEC FORECASTS CHINA’S COAL CONSUMPTION TO PEAK AROUND 2025 - REUTERS
China Petrochemical Corp, or Sinopec, expects coal consumption to peak around 2025 at 4.37 billion metric tons, the state energy group said in an o ...
Thursday, 07 December 23
CHINA TO SET UP COAL PRODUCTION RESERVE TO STABILISE PRICES - REUTERS
China will establish a back-up coal production system by 2027 to stabilise prices and secure coal supply, the state planner said on Wednesday, even ...
|
|
|
Showing 61 to 65 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- White Energy Company Limited
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Australian Coal Association
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Planning Commission, India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
