We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 03 February 21
INDONESIA TO EXPORT 395 MILLION TONS OF COAL IN 2021 - ESDM
Data from the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources shows that, Indonesia is planning to produce 550 million Ton of coal in 2021 and as of t ...
Wednesday, 03 February 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
"2020 the year from hell for the entire world, had everything for shipowners. The introduction of the sulphur cap and VLSFO, a Pandemic outbre ...
Tuesday, 02 February 21
WILL THE ELECTRONIC B/L BE FULLY IMPLEMENTED? FIVE POINTS TO CONSIDER - MOL
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
The trend towards digitization of Bills of Lading (B/L) has begun to attract attention in the trade and shipping industrie ...
Monday, 01 February 21
A 56,000-DWT OPEN MANILA WAS FIXED FOR A TRIP VIA INDONESIA REDELIVERY CHINA AT $11,500 - THE BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize routes endured a week of slippage on rates, bringing the market back down to levels seen at the beginning of the month. D ...
Monday, 01 February 21
PAKISTAN: COAL DEMAND EXPECTED TO SPIKE IN 2021 - DAWN
Coal demand is expected to remain upbeat in 2021 as more coal-fired and captive power plants are coming up in the current year.
Acco ...
|
|
|
Showing 646 to 650 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Planning Commission, India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Australian Coal Association
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PTC India Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
|
| |
| |
|
