We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 24 February 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
With yields of up to 563%, the shares of Greek shipping companies listed on Wall Street are recorded. The Coronavirus pandemic has not significantl ...
Sunday, 21 February 21
ANZ DIVESTING FROM THE WORLD’S LARGEST COAL EXPORT PORT IS 'PRAGMATISM' - IEEFA
The biggest buyers of Australian thermal coal have committed to net-zero emissions
ANZ, Australia’s third largest bank, has decided to s ...
Sunday, 21 February 21
EDITORIAL: TIME FOR BANGLADESH TO FOCUS ON RENEWABLE ENERGY, NOT COAL - DHAKA TRIBUNE
Shifting away from coal is not only desirable, but absolutely necessary in these times.
In spite of being detrimental to environment ...
Wednesday, 17 February 21
STRANDED ASSETS A LONG-TERM RISK FOR MAJOR FOSSIL FUEL EXPORTERS - FITCH RATINGS
Fossil exporters face a loss of GDP, government revenue and export receipts from the transition to a lower-carbon economy over the coming decades. ...
Friday, 12 February 21
U.S: WIND SURPASSED COAL AS NO. 1 FUEL SOURCE IN 2020 FOR SOUTHWEST POWER POOL - IEEFA
Wind energy growth due to geography, design factors, and new installations
Wind surpassed coal as the primary power generation sourc ...
|
|
|
Showing 636 to 640 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- VISA Power Limited - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- The University of Queensland
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Planning Commission, India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
