We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 27 January 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
As we have entered the era off renewable energies, all industries globally give max effort to minimize their carbon footprint and consequently thei ...
Monday, 25 January 21
ULTRAMAX YET ANOTHER POSITIVE WEEK FOR THE SECTOR, WHICH SAW INCREASED DEMAND ACROSS ALL BASINS - BALTIC BRIEFING
Capesize
The Capesize market rocked and rolled these past few days. But by weeks end little had changed on the Capesize 5TC as it settled down ...
Monday, 25 January 21
NEW LAW IN CALIFORNIA, USA, AFFECTING SHIPOWNERS' LIABILITY FOR OIL POLLUTION - BIMCO
Members are advised that amendments to the so-called Lempert-Keene-Seastrand Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act of 1990 in the State of Californ ...
Monday, 25 January 21
COAL INDIA SAYS GEARED UP TO MEET SURGE IN FUEL DEMAND FROM POWER SECTOR - PTI
State-owned Coal India Ltd on Saturday said that it is well geared to meet any surge in demand for coal from the power sector.
The s ...
Sunday, 24 January 21
GOVT ASSURES COAL INDIA OF 'FULL SUPPORT', STRESSES ON LEARNING 'NEW THINGS' - PTI
Coal Minister Pralhad Joshi assured Coal India of full government support, even as he said the PSU needs to learn “new things” for impr ...
|
|
|
Showing 656 to 660 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- White Energy Company Limited
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
