We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 29 January 21
COAL EXPORTS FROM AUSTRALIA TO MAINLAND CHINA DECLINED BY -22.2% Y-O-Y IN 2020 - BANCHERO COSTA
In the 12 months of 2020, global seaborne coal trade declined by as much as -12.7% year-on-year, according to vessel tracking data from Refinitiv, ...
Friday, 29 January 21
OPEC+, COVID-19 AND ENERGY TRANSITION - 3 THEMES IMPACTING OIL MARKETS AND REFINING IN 2021 - WOOD MACKENZIE
Wood Mackenzie’s latest outlook report shows that the art of balancing oil markets and the refining sector in 2021 hinges upon three key them ...
Thursday, 28 January 21
STRONG CHINESE THERMAL COAL IMPORTS TO BENEFIT INDONESIAN MINERS IN THE NEAR TERM - FITCH RATINGS
China's thermal coal imports are likely to remain strong ahead of the Chinese New Year in mid-February on robust demand, high utilisation at do ...
Thursday, 28 January 21
WIND PROPULSION FOR DRY BULK CARRIERS - OLDENDORFF
Oldendorff Carriers (OC) has signed a Joint Development Project (JDP) with Anemoi Marine Technologies (Anemoi), Lloyd’s Register (LR) and Sha ...
Thursday, 28 January 21
BUMA PRICED A USD400 MILLION 7.75% 5-YEAR SENIOR NOTES
PT Delta Dunia Makmur Tbk. announced that its subsidiary, PT Bukit Makmur Mandiri Utama priced a USD400 million 5-year (non-callable 2-year)& ...
|
|
|
Showing 651 to 655 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Australian Coal Association
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- White Energy Company Limited
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PTC India Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|