We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 10 February 21
FY21 COAL DEMAND MAY BE LOWER THAN PREVIOUSLY ESTIMATED DUE TO COVID-19: PRALHAD JOSHI - PTI
Coal demand in the current fiscal may be lower than the initial estimate of 1,085 million tonnes (MT) due to the impact of COVID-19, Parliament was ...
Wednesday, 10 February 21
MARKET INSIGHT - INTERMODAL
We have just entered February, Chinese New Year holidays are about to start and the SnP market for bulkers is so hot as every seller would dream of ...
Tuesday, 09 February 21
SWITCHING COAL PLANTS TO PLN'S BIOMASS COFIRING PLAN IS NO MAGIC BULLET - IEEFA
Implementation risks for Indonesia PLN's switch from coal to biomass cofiring
PLN’s biomass cofiring plan will require not ...
Friday, 05 February 21
THE INDONESIA COAL PRICE REFERENCE FOR FEBRUARY 2021 SETTLES AT US$ 87.79 PER TON FOB VESSEL
COALspot.com: The Indonesia coal price reference for February 2021 settles at US$ 87.79 per ton FOB vessel. The February reference price is the hig ...
Thursday, 04 February 21
WHY BANGLADESH SHOULDN’T COUNT ON A FOSSIL FUEL FUTURE - IEEFA
Around US$50 billion of LNG projects in Asia at risk of cancellation
Two astonishing figures have circulated in the Asian energy sector in the ...
|
|
|
Showing 641 to 645 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- The University of Queensland
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Planning Commission, India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Parliament of New Zealand
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Australian Coal Association
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- White Energy Company Limited
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
