We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 27 February 21
CHINA'S BENCHMARK POWER COAL PRICE EDGES DOWN - XINHUA
China’s benchmark power coal price dropped slightly during the past week.
The Bohai-Rim Steam-Coal Price Index (BSPI), a gauge ...
Saturday, 27 February 21
FITCH RATINGS REVISES GLOBAL METALS AND MINING PRICE ASSUMPTIONS
Fitch Ratings has revised some of its metals and mining price assumptions as prices for many commodities will benefit in the short term from return ...
Saturday, 27 February 21
MITSUBISHI PULLS OUT OF VINH TAN 3 COAL PROJECT IN VIETNAM - NIKKEI ASIA
Japanese trading house Mitsubishi Corp. decided Thursday to withdraw from the Vinh Tan 3 coal-fired power plant project in Vietnam amid growing int ...
Thursday, 25 February 21
ARE WE ON THE CUSP OF ANOTHER MINING SUPER-CYCLE? - WOOD MACKENZIE
As the first wave of the coronavirus pandemic began to bite, many observers confidently predicted that the end was nigh for global economic activit ...
Thursday, 25 February 21
2020 PROVED TO BE A TRULY TERRIBLE YEAR FOR SEABORNE COAL TRADE - BANCHERO COSTA
Total loadings in the 12 months of 2020 were down -12.7% year-on-year to 1,130 million tonnes, according to vessels tracking data from Refinitiv, s ...
|
|
|
Showing 631 to 635 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Planning Commission, India
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Minerals Council of Australia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- The University of Queensland
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
|
| |
| |
|
