We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 15 January 11
MAKE SACRIFICES TO SAVE PLN, INDONESIA GOVT BEGS MINERS - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta Globe reported that, Darwin Zahedi Saleh, Indonesia's minister of energy and mineral resources, on Friday appealed to local coal compan ...
Saturday, 15 January 11
RISING PRICES, GOVERNMENT DECREE LEAVE PLN AT LOGGERHEADS WITH COAL FIRMS - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta Globe reported that, As coal prices continue to increase, state utility Perusahaan Listrik Negara faces problems in securing enough coal ...
Thursday, 13 January 11
SURGING COAL PRICES UNDERMINE PLN'S EFFICIENCY PROGRAM - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, The soaring global coal prices are undermining state electricity company PT PLN's pledge to improve its operational ...
Thursday, 13 January 11
SPML INFRA TO DOUBLE INDONESIA COAL MINE OUTPUT IN TWO YEARS - DNA INDIA
DNA India reported that, Kolkata-based infrastructure company SPML Infra, formerly Subhash Projects & Marketing Ltd, will in two years nearly do ...
Thursday, 13 January 11
DRY BULK RATES HIT NEW MULTI-MONTH LOWS ON AUSTRALIAS FLOODS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Floods in Australia’s Queensland has seriously disrupted coal shipments and together with a flood of vessels has pushed freight rates for dry ...
|
|
|
Showing 5426 to 5430 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Planning Commission, India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Parliament of New Zealand
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- The University of Queensland
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Australian Coal Association
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
