We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Monday, 10 January 11
DEWA SEEKS ADVICE ON COAL POWER PROJECT -THE NATIONAL
The Dubai utility company gets nine bids from international groups for consultancy role.
The National reported that, Dubai's utility company wil ...
Saturday, 08 January 11
COAL PRICE WILL RISE IN SHORT-TERM DUE TO AUSTRALIA FLOODS - ALBUQUERQUE EXPRESS
Albuquerque Express reported that, Queensland’s mining minister, Stephen Robertson, has warned that the Australian state’s coal mines wi ...
Saturday, 08 January 11
THE INDONESIAN COAL REFERENCE PRICE HAS JUMPED 8.69 PERCENT IN JANUARY 2011
COALspot.com - Indonesia’s Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources has set the January 2011 Indonesian Coal Reference Price for thermal ...
Saturday, 08 January 11
SUPRAMAX VESSELS WERE FIXED AT AROUND $ 9000 PD FOR A TRIP VIA INDONESIA TO INDIA - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The holiday season affect combined with severe flooding in Queensland ports continues to keep the market and pressure. “Suprama ...
Saturday, 08 January 11
DIFFICULT YEAR FOR SHIPPING - TRANSPORT WEEKLY
Transport Weekly reported that, Shipping Corporation of India (SCI) chairman Sabyasachi Hajara says 2011 will be a difficult year because an excess ...
|
|
|
Showing 5436 to 5440 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Planning Commission, India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Australian Coal Association
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|