We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 19 January 11
DRY BULK MARKET HAS BOTTOMED OUT, AS WEATHER IN AUSTRALIA DIALS DOWN - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has finally halted its plunge, after a devastating week of yet more losses. The industry’s benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index ...
Tuesday, 18 January 11
MINISTRY SEEKS COAL FROM INDONESIA - SUNDAY OBSERVER
Sunday Observer reported that, Ministry of Power and Energy is to explore the possibilities of importing quality coal from Indonesia.
Minister Pa ...
Tuesday, 18 January 11
DRY BULK MARKET HAS BOTTOMED OUT, AS WEATHER IN AUSTRALIA DIALS DOWN - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has finally halted its plunge, after a devastating week of yet more losses. The industry’s benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index ...
Sunday, 16 January 11
STANCHART GLOBAL RESEARCH SEES COAL PRICE RISING ON SUPPLY DISRUPTION - BURSA MALAYSIA MARKET NEWS
Bursa Malaysia Market News reported that, Standard Chartered Global Research has upgraded its 2011 forecasts for global thermal coal prices based on ...
Saturday, 15 January 11
SUPRAMAX VESSELS FIXED AROUND $ 8K FOR TRIP VIA INDONESIA TO INDIA - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The BDI continues to drop and has touched below 1,500 points with the cape index severely affected with the index touching 1,595 poin ...
|
|
|
Showing 5421 to 5425 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
|
| |
| |
|
