We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Saturday, 22 January 11
POSSIBLE COAL EXPORT RESTRICTIONS ON INDONESIA UNLIKELY TO AFFECT CHURCHILL MINING - PROACTIVE INVESTORS
Proactive Investors reported that, Churchill Mining moved to reassure investors after a fall in its share price, stating that from talks with the au ...
Thursday, 20 January 11
INDONESIA MAY BAN LOW-QUALITY COAL EXPORTS FROM 2014 - BLOOMBERG
Bloomberg reported that, The Indonesian government plans to ban exports of coal with an energy value of less than 5,600 kilocalories a kilogram star ...
Thursday, 20 January 11
SUPRAS ARE DOING USD 7- 8K FOR INDONESIA-INDIA - FEARNBULK
Handy
Negative sentiment for forward positions in the Atlantic market due to lack of cargo availability and too many ballasters from the East. Con ...
Thursday, 20 January 11
ITMG TARGETS TO PRODUCE 25 MILLION TONS OF COAL THIS YEAR - BISNIS INDONESIA
Bisnis Indonesia reported that, Coal producer PT Indo Tambangraya Megah Tbk (ITMG) targets to produce 25 million tons of coal this year, a 13. ...
Thursday, 20 January 11
DRY BULK MARKETS FALL SEES NO END - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
Pundits indicating that the dry bulk market’s sentiment remains weak were justified, as the industry’s benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index ( ...
|
|
|
Showing 5416 to 5420 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Parliament of New Zealand
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- VISA Power Limited - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- The University of Queensland
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- White Energy Company Limited
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Planning Commission, India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Australian Coal Association
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- PTC India Limited - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
|
| |
| |
|
