We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Wednesday, 12 January 11
BULKER DELIVERIES WEIGHING IN ON FREIGHT RATES KEEPING SENTIMENT ON A NEGATIVE MODE - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
A flurry of new buildings still hitting the water has caught up for good with the freight market, with capesizes unable to weather the storm. With r ...
Tuesday, 11 January 11
SUPRAMAX TRIP VIA INDONESIA TO INDIA US$ 8,000 PER DAY
Despite continued growth in the bulk trades, the delivery of new vessels is beginning to take its toll. The BDI continued its decline, finishing las ...
Tuesday, 11 January 11
DRY BULK MARKET REACHES NEW LOWS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market’s benchmark index, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) lost further ground in the beginning of the week, following the trend of the ...
Monday, 10 January 11
MINING INVESTMENT TARGET TOO LOW - TEMPO INTERACTIVE
TEMPO Interactive reported that, the Indonesian Mining Association’s executive director, Priyo Pribadi, believes the government’s invest ...
Monday, 10 January 11
COAL MONGOLIA IS INVITING YOU TO THE INTERNATIONAL COAL SECTOR INVESTORS CONFERENCE
COALspot.com - (Press Release) - The Coal Mongolian Conference will take place at Chinggis Hotel, in Ulaanbaatar on 24-25, Feb 2011. The coal bonanz ...
|
|
|
Showing 5431 to 5435 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- White Energy Company Limited
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- The University of Queensland
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Minerals Council of Australia
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Planning Commission, India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- PTC India Limited - India
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Australian Coal Association
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
|
| |
| |
|
