We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 25 January 11
DRY BULK RATES CONTINUED TO TUMBLE LAST WEEK - BRS
With weather-related problems affecting the short-term outlook, and new building deliveries the longer-term picture, dry bulk rates continued to tum ...
Tuesday, 25 January 11
R-POWER TO INVEST $5BN IN INDONESIA - THE TIMES OF INDIA
The Times of India reported that, In what is being seen as one of the largest foreign investments in Indonesia, Reliance Power will infuse $5 billio ...
Monday, 24 January 11
GOVT PROMISES COAL FOR PLN DESPITE PRICE SPIKES - THE JAKARTA POST
The Jakarta Post reported that, the government says state electricity company PT PLN will receive enough coal to fire its power plants, despite pric ...
Monday, 24 January 11
DRY BULK MARKETS DOWNTURN SEES NO RELIEF - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market has kept falling for yet another week, with the industry’s benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) losing an additional 4.79 ...
Sunday, 23 January 11
THE AVERAGE CHARTER RATE FOR CAPE SIZE VESSELS WAS AT $ 8,859 PD ALMOST CLOSE TO 2008 LOWS - VISTAAR
COALspot.com - The BDI continues to drop and saw a drop of about 5 pct this week closing at 1,370 points. “ In May 2010 the BDI touched ...
|
|
|
Showing 5411 to 5415 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Planning Commission, India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Australian Coal Association
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- The University of Queensland
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- White Energy Company Limited
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
|
| |
| |
|
