We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
 KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Friday, 28 January 11
MPM SEEKS 40K TONS OF INDONESIAN COAL
An Indian paper producer Mysore Paper Mills Ltd., based in Bangalore is looking for 40,000 metric tons of non-coking coal of Indonesian o ...
Friday, 28 January 11
TRADING PERMIT DELAYS THREATEN EXPORTS - THE JAKARTA GLOBE
The Jakarta Globe reported that, an ongoing wrangle over licenses for mining traders could hurt investment, a coal mining association chief said on ...
Friday, 28 January 11
DRY BULK MARKET CLOSING IN TOWARDS CRISIS LEVELS - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The trials and tribulations of the dry bulk market seem to have no end during the first month of 2011, as the industry’s benchmark, the Baltic ...
Wednesday, 26 January 11
ADANI TO SET-UP RAIL, PORT AND POWER PROJECTS IN INDONESIA - MONEYCONTROL
Moneycontrol reported that, Adani Enterprises, the flagship company of India’s infrastructure conglomerate the Adani Group, today announced th ...
Wednesday, 26 January 11
DRY BULK MARKET TAKES YET ANOTHER NOSEDIVE, CAPESIZES LOOK RATHER UNATTRACTIVE AT THE MOMENT - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The downturn of the dry bulk market sees no boundariers, disproving even those who thought that at least for the capesize market, the worst had pass ...
|
|
|
Showing 5406 to 5410 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- VISA Power Limited - India
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- The University of Queensland
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Australian Coal Association
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- PTC India Limited - India
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Parliament of New Zealand
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Minerals Council of Australia
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- Planning Commission, India
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- White Energy Company Limited
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|
