We welcome article submissions from experts in the areas of coal, mining,
shipping, etc.
To Submit your article please click here.
|
|
|
Friday, 17 July 15
DO CANCELLATION RIGHTS UNDER VOYAGE CHARTERPARTY SURVIVE RE-NOMINATION OF LOAD PORT? - INCE&CO
KNOWLEDGE TO ELEVATE
Do cancellation rights under voyage charterparty survive re-nomination of load port?
St Shipping & Transport Inc v. Kriti Filoxenia Shipping Co SA [2015] EWHC 997 (Comm) (MT Kriti Filoxenia)
The Commercial Court has considered whether cancellation provisions in the BEEPEEVOY3 charterparty form were applicable in the event of re-nomination of a load port by charterers under the charter. In this case, the Charterers re-nominated the load port which the Owners were not able to reach by the cancellation date. The Charterers cancelled the charterparty. In arbitration proceedings, the Tribunal found that the cancellation provisions were not applicable where the Charterers had exercised the contractual option to re-nominate a load port. The Charterers appealed the decision to the Commercial Court, which upheld the findings of the Tribunal and dismissed the appeal.
The background facts
This case concerned a voyage charterparty under the BEEPEEVOY 3 standard form. The key clauses in the charterparty provided as follows:
“17.… If it appears to Charterers that the Vessel will be delayed beyond the Cancelling Date Charterers may require Owners to notify Charterers of the date on which they expect the Vessel to be ready to load whereupon Charterers shall have the option to cancel this Charter…
24.… If after any loading or discharge port or place has been nominated Charterers desire to vary such port or place, Owners shall issue such revised instructions as are necessary at any time to give effect to Charterers’ revised orders and any period by which the steaming time taken to reach the alternative port or place exceeds the time which should have been taken had the Vessel proceeded thither directly shall count as laytime or, if the Vessel is on demurrage, as demurrage.”
The vessel proceeded to a nominated load port within the range provided for under the charterparty. The Charterers then nominated an alternative load port under clause 24. The Owners could not reach that load port by the cancellation date and the Charterers cancelled the charterparty in reliance upon clause 17. The Owners denied that the Charterers had a right to cancel and accepted the cancellation as a repudiation of the charterparty. The dispute went to arbitration.
The arbitration award
The Tribunal found in favour of the Owners and held that the cancellation provisions in clause 17 did not apply where the Charterers exercised the liberty given under clause 24 to re-nominate the load port. The Tribunal further held that, even if the cancellation provisions did apply, the Charterers may not cancel where the re-nomination was made at a time when the estimated time of arrival for the re-nominated port was after the cancellation date under the charterparty. The Charterers appealed to the Commercial Court.
The Commercial Court decision
When it came to construing the words in clauses 17 and 24 of the charterparty, the Court took as its starting point the ordinary and natural meaning of the words used in those clauses as they would be understood by reasonable charterers and owners in the context in which the agreement was made. The Court highlighted the importance of the fact that the parties to a charterparty were involved in a venture which required a degree of co-operation in order to work successfully. Regarding clause 17, the cancellation clause, the Charterers’ ability to cancel necessarily entailed that the Charterers would do what is necessary on their part to enable the vessel to achieve that cancellation date and not impair the
Owners’ ability to comply with that date
The Court also looked at the reasons why it is in the interests of both sides to agree a cancellation date. At common law, subject to the express terms of a charterparty, both parties are bound by the contract until the delay is such that it frustrates the commercial purpose of the venture. Agreeing a cancellation date provides certainty to both parties in that it avoids disputes as to when that delay has frustrated a contract, which is a matter of fact in each case.
The Court referred to the “broad commercial interpretation” it has previously taken in the construction of these types of clauses, in order to achieve the parties’ commercial objectives. In this regard, the Court examined the commercial considerations which underlie the re-nomination clause. For the Charterers, the main advantage of this clause is to have greater flexibility to revise their orders so as to tailor their shipping arrangements according to their cargo arrangements. On the other hand, absence of the load port re-nomination provision would be advantageous to the Owners since it would give them the certainty of an irrevocable nomination. The Court also noted the commercial value of the cancellation clause from the Charterers’ perspective. On balance, the Court placed more importance on the Owners’ concerns of losing the certainty of an irrevocable nomination, whilst at the same time remaining exposed to the Charterers’ right to cancel.
The Court also noted that clause 24 made no express reference to the cancellation rights under clause 17. The Court recognised that the BEEPEEVOY 3 charterparty, being a standard form, is a document drafted with considerable care. Had the draftsmen of this form intended for the clause 17 cancellation rights to apply to a re-nomination of the load port under clause 24, express words would have been used to that effect and would have provided for how such rights would apply and in what circumstances. No such words were present in this case.
The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Comment
This case serves as a useful reminder of the English Court’s approach to the interpretation of charterparty provisions and, in particular, to consideration of the interplay between a cancellation clause and a load port re-nomination provision under a voyage charterparty. This decision also highlights the Court’s commercial approach to such issues, in particular its reference to the Charterers’ duty to co-operate with the Owners and to do what is necessary to enable the vessel to achieve the cancellation date if they wish to be able to rely upon the cancellation clause.
Source: INCE&Co
If you believe an article violates your rights or the rights of others, please contact us.
|
|
Tuesday, 05 April 11
DRY BULK MARKET DOWN ON FIRST DAY OF SECOND QUARTER - NIKOS ROUSSANOGLOU, HELLENIC SHIPPING
The dry bulk market began the second quarter on a downward pattern, with the industry’s benchmark, the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) shedding 1.45 pe ...
Monday, 04 April 11
INDONESIA INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE FOCUS ON INDONESIA'S ECONOMY (IICFIE) 2011 MASTER PLAN TO ACCELERATE THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Press Release - Since couple of years, Indonesia's economy show impressive growth. What is the Indonesia's Economic Corridor and the Master plan t ...
Saturday, 02 April 11
TNPL CALLS FOR 160KT OF NON-COKING COAL
COALspot.com - Tamil Nadu Newsprint and Papers Limited (TNPL), is seeking to procure another 160,000 MT +/- 5 percent of Non-Coking imported C ...
Saturday, 02 April 11
THE FREIGHT MARKETS LIKELY TO BE SOFT NEXT WEEK - VISTAAR SINGAPORE
COALspot.com - The freight market softened this week affecting all sectors with BDI down by 65 points (down by 4.10 pct) and closed at 1,520 points. ...
Friday, 01 April 11
SUPRAS EX RICHARDS BAY COAL TERMINAL TO INDIA HOVERING AT $ 25 - 27.00 PMT - FEARNBULK
Handy
Atlantic markets remain stable with more activity from the Black Sea to FEast paying in the mid 20´s on Supras. The USG remains firm p ...
|
|
|
Showing 5316 to 5320 news of total 6871 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
- Offshore Bulk Terminal Pte Ltd, Singapore
- Karbindo Abesyapradhi - Indoneisa
- Miang Besar Coal Terminal - Indonesia
- Edison Trading Spa - Italy
- Dalmia Cement Bharat India
- Directorate Of Revenue Intelligence - India
- Gujarat Mineral Development Corp Ltd - India
- Kumho Petrochemical, South Korea
- Electricity Authority, New Zealand
- CNBM International Corporation - China
- GVK Power & Infra Limited - India
- Cement Manufacturers Association - India
- Bhushan Steel Limited - India
- Bulk Trading Sa - Switzerland
- Trasteel International SA, Italy
- Siam City Cement PLC, Thailand
- Therma Luzon, Inc, Philippines
- Eastern Coal Council - USA
- Pendopo Energi Batubara - Indonesia
- Globalindo Alam Lestari - Indonesia
- Renaissance Capital - South Africa
- Bangladesh Power Developement Board
- Aboitiz Power Corporation - Philippines
- Karaikal Port Pvt Ltd - India
- Cigading International Bulk Terminal - Indonesia
- Energy Development Corp, Philippines
- Global Business Power Corporation, Philippines
- Ceylon Electricity Board - Sri Lanka
- Formosa Plastics Group - Taiwan
- Semirara Mining Corp, Philippines
- Banpu Public Company Limited - Thailand
- Thai Mozambique Logistica
- Kepco SPC Power Corporation, Philippines
- Minerals Council of Australia
- OPG Power Generation Pvt Ltd - India
- Coastal Gujarat Power Limited - India
- Romanian Commodities Exchange
- McConnell Dowell - Australia
- Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- ASAPP Information Group - India
- Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand
- Orica Mining Services - Indonesia
- Indika Energy - Indonesia
- Georgia Ports Authority, United States
- GMR Energy Limited - India
- Pipit Mutiara Jaya. PT, Indonesia
- Jorong Barutama Greston.PT - Indonesia
- Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd, - India
- Medco Energi Mining Internasional
- Africa Commodities Group - South Africa
- Sree Jayajothi Cements Limited - India
- Bayan Resources Tbk. - Indonesia
- Attock Cement Pakistan Limited
- Tata Chemicals Ltd - India
- San Jose City I Power Corp, Philippines
- Borneo Indobara - Indonesia
- Power Finance Corporation Ltd., India
- Billiton Holdings Pty Ltd - Australia
- Samtan Co., Ltd - South Korea
- TeaM Sual Corporation - Philippines
- VISA Power Limited - India
- Mercator Lines Limited - India
- Merrill Lynch Commodities Europe
- Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Limited - India
- Holcim Trading Pte Ltd - Singapore
- Videocon Industries ltd - India
- Carbofer General Trading SA - India
- Thiess Contractors Indonesia
- Port Waratah Coal Services - Australia
- New Zealand Coal & Carbon
- Commonwealth Bank - Australia
- Baramulti Group, Indonesia
- Toyota Tsusho Corporation, Japan
- Meralco Power Generation, Philippines
- Dong Bac Coal Mineral Investment Coporation - Vietnam
- London Commodity Brokers - England
- Orica Australia Pty. Ltd.
- Kaltim Prima Coal - Indonesia
- PTC India Limited - India
- Indian Energy Exchange, India
- Star Paper Mills Limited - India
- Mjunction Services Limited - India
- Deloitte Consulting - India
- Meenaskhi Energy Private Limited - India
- Independent Power Producers Association of India
- The Treasury - Australian Government
- Simpson Spence & Young - Indonesia
- Metalloyd Limited - United Kingdom
- Jaiprakash Power Ventures ltd
- India Bulls Power Limited - India
- Lanco Infratech Ltd - India
- Indian Oil Corporation Limited
- The University of Queensland
- LBH Netherlands Bv - Netherlands
- Sarangani Energy Corporation, Philippines
- Vedanta Resources Plc - India
- Siam City Cement - Thailand
- Wood Mackenzie - Singapore
- SMG Consultants - Indonesia
- CIMB Investment Bank - Malaysia
- Binh Thuan Hamico - Vietnam
- Standard Chartered Bank - UAE
- Central Java Power - Indonesia
- Agrawal Coal Company - India
- Rio Tinto Coal - Australia
- Savvy Resources Ltd - HongKong
- Ministry of Finance - Indonesia
- IHS Mccloskey Coal Group - USA
- Vijayanagar Sugar Pvt Ltd - India
- White Energy Company Limited
- Goldman Sachs - Singapore
- Kohat Cement Company Ltd. - Pakistan
- Global Green Power PLC Corporation, Philippines
- Posco Energy - South Korea
- Gujarat Sidhee Cement - India
- Singapore Mercantile Exchange
- Iligan Light & Power Inc, Philippines
- Dr Ramakrishna Prasad Power Pvt Ltd - India
- Bukit Makmur.PT - Indonesia
- Alfred C Toepfer International GmbH - Germany
- Indogreen Group - Indonesia
- Vizag Seaport Private Limited - India
- Ambuja Cements Ltd - India
- Asmin Koalindo Tuhup - Indonesia
- Sical Logistics Limited - India
- Straits Asia Resources Limited - Singapore
- Global Coal Blending Company Limited - Australia
- Truba Alam Manunggal Engineering.Tbk - Indonesia
- Manunggal Multi Energi - Indonesia
- Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission - India
- TNB Fuel Sdn Bhd - Malaysia
- GN Power Mariveles Coal Plant, Philippines
- SMC Global Power, Philippines
- Coal and Oil Company - UAE
- Latin American Coal - Colombia
- Economic Council, Georgia
- Aditya Birla Group - India
- PowerSource Philippines DevCo
- PNOC Exploration Corporation - Philippines
- Filglen & Citicon Mining (HK) Ltd - Hong Kong
- Asia Pacific Energy Resources Ventures Inc, Philippines
- Malabar Cements Ltd - India
- Anglo American - United Kingdom
- Interocean Group of Companies - India
- PetroVietnam Power Coal Import and Supply Company
- Madhucon Powers Ltd - India
- Uttam Galva Steels Limited - India
- Bahari Cakrawala Sebuku - Indonesia
- Bhatia International Limited - India
- The State Trading Corporation of India Ltd
- Antam Resourcindo - Indonesia
- Chamber of Mines of South Africa
- Kalimantan Lumbung Energi - Indonesia
- Bukit Baiduri Energy - Indonesia
- Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd
- Sindya Power Generating Company Private Ltd
- Australian Commodity Traders Exchange
- Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, Philippines
- Chettinad Cement Corporation Ltd - India
- Timah Investasi Mineral - Indoneisa
- Essar Steel Hazira Ltd - India
- Barasentosa Lestari - Indonesia
- Australian Coal Association
- Larsen & Toubro Limited - India
- Riau Bara Harum - Indonesia
- Kobexindo Tractors - Indoneisa
- Indonesian Coal Mining Association
- IEA Clean Coal Centre - UK
- Kartika Selabumi Mining - Indonesia
- Bukit Asam (Persero) Tbk - Indonesia
- Mintek Dendrill Indonesia
- Ministry of Mines - Canada
- Indo Tambangraya Megah - Indonesia
- Bhoruka Overseas - Indonesia
- GAC Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd
- Bharathi Cement Corporation - India
- Sakthi Sugars Limited - India
- Intertek Mineral Services - Indonesia
- Oldendorff Carriers - Singapore
- Salva Resources Pvt Ltd - India
- Directorate General of MIneral and Coal - Indonesia
- Energy Link Ltd, New Zealand
- Krishnapatnam Port Company Ltd. - India
- Planning Commission, India
- Kapuas Tunggal Persada - Indonesia
- Mercuria Energy - Indonesia
- Eastern Energy - Thailand
- Price Waterhouse Coopers - Russia
- Altura Mining Limited, Indonesia
- Grasim Industreis Ltd - India
- SN Aboitiz Power Inc, Philippines
- MS Steel International - UAE
- Xindia Steels Limited - India
- Heidelberg Cement - Germany
- Parliament of New Zealand
- International Coal Ventures Pvt Ltd - India
- South Luzon Thermal Energy Corporation
- Makarim & Taira - Indonesia
- Marubeni Corporation - India
- Tamil Nadu electricity Board
- Leighton Contractors Pty Ltd - Australia
- ICICI Bank Limited - India
- Parry Sugars Refinery, India
- Kideco Jaya Agung - Indonesia
- Central Electricity Authority - India
- Sojitz Corporation - Japan
- European Bulk Services B.V. - Netherlands
- Sinarmas Energy and Mining - Indonesia
- AsiaOL BioFuels Corp., Philippines
- Ind-Barath Power Infra Limited - India
- Coalindo Energy - Indonesia
- Petron Corporation, Philippines
- Ministry of Transport, Egypt
- Wilmar Investment Holdings
- Petrochimia International Co. Ltd.- Taiwan
- Maheswari Brothers Coal Limited - India
- Jindal Steel & Power Ltd - India
|
| |
| |
|